Getting Hubs to mainnet is the most critical goal for Farcaster to date. Anything that accelerates that is a positive outcome.

My team at Peeple DAO can help source the builders from our affiliate DAOs like Developer DAO and other technical communities.

Funding these initiatives is directly related to furthering the decentralization of the fc protocol, as hubs are central to that mission.

Buidl season is here

Let’s deploy the Treasury to push forward the Farcaster Protocol. That’s what it’s there for.

I'm in support of things we can do on the margin to increase the # of unique contributors to the FC repo. This feels like the perfect use for the treasury. Small grants have a direct impact on increasing the velocity of the Hubs launch by helping incentivize developers to tackle thankless issues. It also has the nice benefit of letting us work directly with the MM team so we don't need to make a technical assessment and can instead focus on capital allocation.

The tasks on github are very well tagged and organized, there should be either a set of new tags representing the reward amounts, or existing tags should be mapped to the reward amount. https://github.com/farcasterxyz/hub/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22help+wanted%22 There should also be a certain limited amount of small tasks to incentivize larger contributions as well. In this current form, I find the scope of the proposal vaguely expressed.

Don’t love ~10% of treasury going to multisig think it’s a bad precedence. Not loving merklem control over PRs and little visibility into when Hub whitelist opens. Net net too much trusting required.