can't fly a plane without a cockpit full of instruments

Supporting this prop because @mfrs_manuel's dashboards benefit all current and future DAOs bringing immediate value to the Builder ecosystem. p.s. even though I am supporting this prop, I am concerned about the precedent of resubmitting a rejected proposal without modifications. As a DAO, we need to come up with a process to handle cases like this.

We need more tools to analyze the data on DAOs created with builder. This would make it much easier to bootstrap those dashboards for specific DAOs

Defeated proposals coming back on chain straight away with no modifications is a terrible precedent and this should be rejected on that basis alone. Or are we just rendering the governance token useless.

We need more data tools in our DAOs. I say this with first hand experience.

Standing by my previous vote. Also resubmission of the same vote from a different vote doesn't set a good precedent for the dao

Even though we already have Terminal's dashboard and it's pretty great, I understand that mfrs proposal differential is the modular dashboard for DAOs built on Builder, which is customizable. Also, I don't think the existence of a product should be a barrier to other builders building similar projects since we're in a decentralized organization.

in favor of tools like this that provide value to all nounish daos