I'd like to vote for this, but in this case retro funding of $3K seems excessive when the Gnars branding is so minimal. There was a huge opportunity to show off Gnars here, and in the end there is only one logo (without any name, website, etc) - and placed directly behind a tree. For a newbie (who this branding would target) there is just a logo and no other information. Not even a name on it to look up if they wanted to do so manually. So for these reasons, I'm voting no.
If you took another pass on the park and painted Gnars branding all over the place, documented and shared that process on socials, and submit another retro round - I would vote yes on that.